D-G FUEL DISPENSER

D-G FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type: Optional

Inlet Pressure : >=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.): 55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle: Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition: -40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset: Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter): Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume: 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range: 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display: Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume: 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount: 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price :0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose: 4.5m

Weight : 205kg.

Dimension(L×W×H): 900*620*2180(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container: 40ft: 45 20ft: 22

ping a little oil flow out of corrugated pipe, put a container under it. The method is suggested to be applicable to other maintenance of hydraulic components. Article VI Solenoid valve In this Article a switch, controlled by electric components, is installed at i fuel dispenser nlet or outlet of measurement transducer, which is used for ensure the accuracy of presetting filling volume of fuel dispenser. Nozzle cannot be closed after finishing presetting volume due to the inertia of pump and pressured oil, which results in that real vol fuel dispenser ume exceed presetting volume so as to affect fuel dispenser’s accuracy. In order to prevent this phenomenon occurring, most of manufacturers of fuel dispenser adopt to mount a solenoid valve at inlet or outlet of measurement transducer, switching off valve prior to presetting volume getting reach through regulating appropriate ahead volume. The method is one of the most efficient measures that used for ensuring fuel dispenser’s accuracy and preventing overrun resulted from the inertia of pump and pressure oil. There are two kinds of solenoid vale --- membrane type and piston type. The former, simple structure and high anti—pollution, is closed through membrane. However, its performance is depended upon the technology about membrane and weather. The latter valve controlled through piston has wide applicable range of temperature, weak to anti-jammed pollution. Double flux solenoid valve is controlled by the position movement of cam that is driven by motor, and large or small flux is realized through the open or closed of main or vice valve. It has merits of wide applicable temperature range, high pollution-resistant. At present, most manufacturers adopt double flux membrane solenoid valve in fuel dispenser. Double flux so fuel dispenser lenoid valve Structure and working principle Membrane solenoid valve is widely adopted recently, which also called double flux solenoid valve, shown in Diagram 2-35 and 2-36. Diagram 2-35: Working principle of double flux solenoid valve Diagram 2-36:

03) ......................................................................................................... 83　　 13.3.1.5. Accord serveur mon tique (D5004)...................................................................................... 84　　 fuel dispenser 13.3.1.6. Indicateur transaction non aboutie (D5005).......................................................................... 84　　 13.3.1.7. Etat denregistrement de transaction (D5006) .................................................. fuel dispenser .................... 84　　 13.3.1.8. Raison de refus denregistrement transaction (D5007) ........................................................ 84　　 13.3.1.9. R f rence compl mentaire transaction (D5008) .................................................................. 84　　 13.3.1.10. Texte du ticket porteur (D5009)............................................................................................ 85　　 13.3.1.11. Commande action carte (D5010) ......................................................................................... 85　　 13.3.1.12. Commande saisie de donn es (D5011) ............................................................................... 85　　 13.3.1.13. Commande contr 磍e de code (D5012) ................................................................................. 86　　 13.3.1.14. Tentatives de contr 磍e de code pr alables (D5013) ............................................................. 86　　 13.3.1.15. Volume carburant (D5014) ................................................................................................... 86　　 13.3.1.16. Identific fuel dispenser ation produit (D5015) ............................................................................................... 86　　 13.3.1.17. Prix unitaire carburant (D5016) ........................................................

e and so on), a sector that for three centuries has lagged behind the “business half of the world�? where productivity has soared and vast amounts of wealth have been created thanks to its competitive, entrepreneurial culture. The emergence of more social entrepreneur fuel dispenser s, and their improved access to growth capital as they get better connected to philanthropists, is creating enormous productivity opportunities for the citizen sector, argues Mr Drayton. The citizen sector is defined somewhat loosely, but is largely made up o fuel dispenser f government plus the non-profit sector. Both government and non-profits have traditionally been run inefficiently. The productivity miracle detected by Mr Drayton is due both to a shift from government provision to more efficient private provision (by both for-profit and non-profit organisations) and by an increase in the efficiency of the non-profit sector. The improvement in non-profit organisations efficiency may still have some way to go. In 2004, Bill Bradley, a former presidential hopeful for the Democrats, and two McKinsey consultants claimed in an article in the Harvard Business Review that, in America alone, there was a �?100 billion opportunity�?for the non-profit sector to improve its efficiency through better management. But is social entrepreneurship the best way to achieve that? There is no easy answer, not least because nobody is sure what exactly the term means. In a book charting the rise of social entrepreneurship, “How to Change the World Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas�? David Bornstein notes that most discussion of social entrepreneurship tends to revolve around “how business and management skills can be applied to achieve social ends�? He himself sees social entrepr fuel dispenser eneurs as “transformative forces people with new ideas to address major problems who are relentless in the pursuit of their visions�? The late management guru Peter Drucker, typically quick to spot the trend, defined social entrepreneurs as peo