D-22Q FUEL DISPENSER

D-22Q FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm): Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition: -40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight: 230kg.

Dimension(L×W×H): 900*620*2180(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 45 20ft: 22

re approval working successfully being conducted. Environmental temperature as approval should keep in the range of �0�to �0� in approval process temperature not exceed 3� relative temperature between 30�and 90� power supply within �0% to �5%; and frequency ±1Hz. The mediums used in approval should adapt real media excepting in factory approval. As different medium would be adaptable to fuel dispenser, every medium should be appraised. Some of them are prohibited, especially water. The highest temperature of medium in approval should not exceed 30� the lowest temperature without coagulation. The temperature difference between the one at the outlet of fuel dispenser and the temperature measured in standard instrument should not exceed 4� Otherwise, the approval is invalid. Standard instrument used in approval whose measuring accuracy no lower than one fifth of the allowed tolerance of fuel d fuel dispenser ispenser, should pass over appraisal of the Measurement Department and be valid within period. There are many standard instruments being adaptable to fuel dispenser’s approval, however, the most popular one is standard metal instrument of measurement. Standard metal instrument of measurement adapted in approval should, in accordance with the requirement of fuel dispenser’s regulations and procedure, be Class II standard metal instrument of measurement with cubage no less than one minute’s discharge volume of fuel dispenser, approval period being 3 years. Standard metal instrument of measurement often is made of stainless steel or carbonized steel with protecting painting, no air vent, erosion-resistant and smooth surface. Its structure is shown in Diagram 8-1. fuel dispenser 1: Overflow cover 2: Metering neck 3: Body 4: Bracket 5: Adjusting bolt 6: Drain valve 7: Leveling instrument 8: Scale Diagram 6-1: Sketch map of metal standard instrument of measurement Standard instrument of measurement is composed of overflow cover, body, measuring neck, scale, valve, which should meet the follo fuel dispenser

completing the tender process (e.g. to　　accelerate the process) this is not the scenario endorsed by IFSF. Two main reasons for that:　　 The split tender could allow the customer to void some purchases because of some failure in the tender　　 process.　　 The card payment might have an effect on the receipt: e.g. when the card scheme issues invoices to　　 document purchases (e.g. many fleet cards) the fuel receipt is not a fiscal receipt but a delivery note. In　　 some countries a delivery note is identified by a specific sentence such as: this is not a fiscal receipt; in　　 other Countries it is even necessary not to print the VAT number to successfully determine the receipt as　　 not fiscal.　　For simplification the scenarios in this document are written as the POS sell application adopts only one　　tender method: card payment.　　1. Customer brings the items to the POS fuel dispenser to be rung up.　　2. Cashier enters the items into the POS and requests the method of payment.　　3. POS passes sales information to EPS requesting card payment.　　4. EPS gets card data　　5. EPS authorises card (not relevant where or how this is performed).　　 a. EPS asks for additional data　　 b. EPS performs any checkfunctionality according to cardconfigurationsystem　　 status　　 c. EPS provides the Eft Receipt to be printed.　　 d. Cashier performs any check if required (including receiving signature from　　 customer if the case)　　 e. Cashier completes EFT transaction on the EPS　　6. EPS tells POS that payment was ok.　　7. POS prints sales receipt.　　8. Cashier gives fuel dispenser Customer EFT Ticket and Sales receipt.　　Alternative Scenario - (1) - Successful payment by card card payment initiated by　　EPS application　　This is valid and applicable but not supported by IFSF. The POS Sell application will be more flexible in　　managing the split of the tender if th fuel dispenser

majority—Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and John Roberts, the new chief justice—will probably be joined soon by a like-minded fellow-Catholic, Samuel Alito. That probably turns a comfortable 6-3 margin into a much tighter 5-4 one. Another conservative nomination could give opponents of the Oregon measure an edge. Beyond that, says Mr Caplan, distrust of the medical profession is currently running so high—pushed by rising costs, the perceived greed of some health-care bosses and malpractice suits—that not many state voters will readily give doctors the same responsibility they have in Oregon. © 2006 . Death and the law (2) A matter of evidence Jan 19th 2006 | RICHMOND From The Economist print edition A 76-year-old is executed and the hunt for a proven innocent goes on fuel dispenser AP NEARLY 14 years ago a Virginian coal miner was executed in the electric chair for the rape and murder of his sister-in-law. To his last breath, Roger Keith Coleman swore he was innocent—and his cause has been taken up by death-penalty opponents ever since. On January 12th, DNA tests proved he was guilty. A few days later, with appeals to the Supreme Court and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger both rejected, Clarence Ray Allen, a blind, diabetic 76-year-old convicted of having three people killed, including his son s girlfriend, was helped from his wheelchair and put to death by lethal injection in California. The victory for death-penalty supporters may not have been as complete as it seems. In their appeals to the Supreme Court, Mr Allen fuel dispenser s lawyers tried to establish that his execution would constitute “cruel and unusual punishment�on two new grounds first, because he was so old (he was the second-oldest to be executed, behind a 77-year-old in Mississippi last month); and, second, because he had spent so long on death row�3 years. Neither convinced the court, bu fuel dispenser